Monthly Archive for November, 2011

Waiting for Sputnik

Quinn O’Neill, 3 Quarks Daily

There’s been a lot of talk about reforming American K-12 science education and it’s getting difficult to take it seriously. Educators, scientists, and politicians have been sounding alarm bells over the state of American science education for decades. In 1983, the National Commission on Excellence in Education revealed the US to be trailing most other industrialized nations in science performance. The commission’s report began: “Our Nation is at risk. Our once unchallenged preeminence in commerce, industry, science, and technological innovation is being overtaken by competitors throughout the world. [...] What was unimaginable a generation ago has begun to occur–others are matching and surpassing our educational attainments.” It almost sounds as if the level of educational attainment isn’t as important as the rest of the world being below it.

Following the 1983 report, most states responded by revising their curriculum content standards.1 In 1990, the president and state governors adopted a new national goal: “By the year 2000, United States students will be the first in the world in mathematics and science achievement.”1 The statement proved about as genuine as Obama’s promise to close Gitmo. In 2000, a new national commission conducted an investigation and concluded that the performance of U.S. students at the 12th-grade level, compared to their peers in other countries, was “disappointingly unchanged,” with the US placing 19th out of twenty-one countries studied.1

Similar calls for reform were made in 2005 with the publication of the National Academy of Science’s report “Rising Above the Gathering Storm”, which made a number of promising recommendations. Those anticipating improvement were to be disappointed. A follow up report in 2010 stated that “In spite of the efforts of both those in government and the private sector, the outlook for America to compete for quality jobs has further deteriorated over the past five years.” It found little improvement and noted that US K-12 math and science was ranked 48th worldwide.

To Read More…

Image via 3quarksdaily.com

Thumbs in Eyes, Kids in Schools

By J.F., The Economist

Thomas Perez - Department of Justice

ON TUESDAY Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil-rights division, sent a letter to the superintendents of Alabama’s school districts. HB56, Alabama’s harsh immigration law, requires “public schools to determine the citizenship and immigration status of students enrolling.” Supporters insist that this information will only be used to compile statistics. Latinos in Alabama, you will not be surprised to hear, are not convinced: school districts seem to be losing Hispanic students. Mr Perez wrote that HB56 “may chill or discourage student participation in, or lead to the exclusion of school-age children from, public education programmes based on their parents’ race, national origin, or actual or perceived immigration status… In Plyler v Doe, the Supreme Court held that a state may not deny a child equal access to public education based on his or her immigration status.” Mr Perez has asked for a list of all students enrolled in the state’s public schools on September 27th (the day before a federal judge in Birmingham allowed most of the law to take effect), and all students who have withdrawn or had at least one unexplained absence since that date. He has asked for the information to be delivered by November 14th, and then by the 15th of every month thereafter. So score one for all lovers of list collection, government bureaucracy and vigorous federal oversight.

As it happens, the lessons of Plyler are not restricted to the intersection of immigration and education. In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that school districts could not deny a free public education to children in the United States unlawfully, meaning they could neither exclude them nor charge them tuition that they did not charge other students. They justified this decision using the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which says that states cannot “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Attorneys for the Texas school district in question tried to argue that illegal immigrants were not “persons within the jurisdiction of the State of Texas”; the Court rightly scoffed at that (one suspects that illegal immigrants who committed a crime would swiftly find out what jurisdiction they were in). The court pointed out that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections are explicitly not limited to citizens. Precedent established in an 1886 case (Yick Wo v Hopkins) held that the promises of equal protection “are universal in their application, to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction without regard to any differences of race, of colour, or of nationality; and the equal protection of the laws is a pledge of the protection of equal laws.” In other words, the Fourteenth Amendment—and, extrapolating from the final clause of the above sentences, the constitution itself—is not a just set of rights granted to American citizens; it is at its heart a set of limits imposed upon governments, states as well as federal.

To Read More…

School Libraries: What’s Now, What’s Next, What’s Yet to Come

From Smashwords.com

School Libraries: What’s Now, What’s Next, What’s Yet to Come

Ebook By Kristin Fontichiaro
Rating: Not yet rated.
Published: Oct. 15, 2011
Category: Non-Fiction » Education and Study Guides » Teaching
Category: Essay » Technology
Words: 45706 (approximate)
Language: English

Ebook Short Description

A crowdsourced collection of over 100 essays from around the world about trends in school libraries written by librarians, teachers, publishers, and library vendors. Edited by Kristin Fontichiaro and Buffy Hamilton. Foreword by R. David Lankes. Photographs by Diane Cordell.

To See More…

Recently published in the Learning Journal

learning_frontRecently published in The International Journal of Learning:

 

Humanitarian Design Project Aims to Build a Sense of Community

Alice Rawsthorn, The New York Times

LONDON — On her first day as a teacher at the Bertie Early College High School in Windsor, North Carolina, Emily Pilloton asked the students to name the last thing they had made themselves. “It could have been something as simple as cookies for their moms, but some of the students couldn’t remember ever making anything,” she recalled. “They’d never held a hammer or taken an art class. Half of them didn’t even know how to read a ruler.”

There were 13 students in the class, all 11th graders. Some came from middle-class families, and others lived in poverty, including a 17-year-old who was struggling to raise a 4-year-old child. They had all signed up to spend three hours a day on Studio H, an experimental design course run from a converted car body shop near the school. The course started in August last year and ended this month with the opening of the Windsor Super Market, a farmers’ market housed in a wooden pavilion that the students had designed and built themselves. As a thank you for their efforts, the Mayor of Windsor presented a key to the city to the entire Studio H team.

“We saw the students change from a complete lack of understanding and, in some cases, a complete lack of interest on the first day into amazingly well-rounded creative thinkers and communicators,” said Ms. Pilloton, a humanitarian designer, who conceived and now runs Studio H with the architect Matthew Miller. “They’d each come such a long way and felt much more invested in their local community, having built something permanent that they could be really proud of.”

To Read More…

A Silicon Valley School That Doesn’t Compute

By Matt Richtel, The New York Times

LOS ALTOS, Calif. — The chief technology officer of eBay sends his children to a nine-classroom school here. So do employees of Silicon Valley giants like Google, Apple, Yahoo and Hewlett-Packard.

But the school’s chief teaching tools are anything but high-tech: pens and paper, knitting needles and, occasionally, mud. Not a computer to be found. No screens at all. They are not allowed in the classroom, and the school even frowns on their use at home.

Schools nationwide have rushed to supply their classrooms with computers, and many policy makers say it is foolish to do otherwise. But the contrarian point of view can be found at the epicenter of the tech economy, where some parents and educators have a message: computers and schools don’t mix.

To Read More…

Image: Jim Wilson / The New York Times

Latest Learning Journal papers

learning

Recently published in The International Journal of Learning:

Inflating the Software Report Card

By Trip Gabriel and Matt Richtel, The New York Times

In Augusta, GA., the school district has expanded the use of Cognitive Tutor math software to all of its high school students.

The Web site of Carnegie Learning, a company started by scientists at Carnegie Mellon University that sells classroom software, trumpets this promise: “Revolutionary Math Curricula. Revolutionary Results.”

The pitch has sounded seductive to thousands of schools across the country for more than a decade. But a review by the United States Department of Education last year would suggest a much less alluring come-on: Undistinguished math curricula. Unproven results.

The federal review of Carnegie Learning’s flagship software, Cognitive Tutor, said the program had “no discernible effects” on the standardized test scores of high school students. A separate 2009 federal look at 10 major software products for teaching algebra as well as elementary and middle school math and reading found that nine of them, including Cognitive Tutor, “did not have statistically significant effects on test scores.”

To Read More…

Image: T. Lynne Pixley for The New York Times