<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelearner.com &#187; 2010 &#187; January &#187; 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelearner.com/2010/01/27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelearner.com</link>
	<description>An international CONFERENCE, a scholarly JOURNAL, a BOOK series, and an online KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Common-Standards Push Bares Unsettled Issues: Familiar Themes Emerge in Resurgent Debate</title>
		<link>http://thelearner.com/2010/01/27/us-common-standards-push-bares-unsettled-issues-familiar-themes-emerge-in-resurgent-debate-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thelearner.com/2010/01/27/us-common-standards-push-bares-unsettled-issues-familiar-themes-emerge-in-resurgent-debate-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelearner.com/?p=2056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Sean Cavanagh in Education Week It is one of the simplest ideas in American education—and one of the most confounding: Elected officials and educators have been talking about establishing national, or common, academic standards for at least a half-century. On its face, the logic of that goal seems incontrovertible. Why should students in one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Sean Cavanagh in <em>Education Week</em></p>
<p>It is one of the simplest ideas in American education—and one of the most confounding: Elected officials and educators have been talking about establishing national, or common, academic standards for at least a half-century.</p>
<p>On its face, the logic of that goal seems incontrovertible.</p>
<p>Why should students in one state be introduced to a topic such as fractions as 1st graders, to cite a common example, when their peers in other states won’t cover that mathematics topic until later? More broadly, why does the United States—a mobile society in a globally competitive era—maintain an education system that tests students, trains teachers, and churns out textbooks and classroom materials based on the myriad and often idiosyncratic demands of different states?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/01/14/17overview.h29.html" target="_blank">To read more&#8230;</a></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--></input>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelearner.com/2010/01/27/us-common-standards-push-bares-unsettled-issues-familiar-themes-emerge-in-resurgent-debate-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

